IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/f3hwj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Who is likely to have illegal eel products after the market regulations?

Author

Listed:
  • Mameno, Kota
  • HSU, Chia-Hsuan
  • TSUGE, Takahiro
  • ONUMA, Ayumi
  • KUBO, Takahiro

Abstract

Wildlife overexploitation is a significant challenge in biodiversity conservation. Regulation can enforce consumer behaviour change to be biodiversity-friendly but also cause unintended negative impacts. A quantitative investigation of consumer preference for alternative goods is needed before the regulation intervention. This study focused on a case of Japanese eels that are threatened with extinction due to commercial fishery and overfishing and clarified potential alternative choices after the market regulations. This study employed a best–worst scaling technique. Our analysis specifies the two consumer groups; approximately 30% of consumers (“Potential Illegal” group) may select illegal eel consumption as their second-best preference. The Potential Illegal group tends to contain males, younger, and people who eat eels once or more annually, in comparison to the other group. Our findings can contribute to setting effective regulations as useful information about potential consumer choice changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mameno, Kota & HSU, Chia-Hsuan & TSUGE, Takahiro & ONUMA, Ayumi & KUBO, Takahiro, 2024. "Who is likely to have illegal eel products after the market regulations?," SocArXiv f3hwj, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:f3hwj
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/f3hwj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65c452c11a30ef0bfac34215/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/f3hwj?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:f3hwj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.