IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/chg26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Voting Behavior of Physicians and Healthcare Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Solnick, Rachel Emily
  • Choi, Hwajung
  • Kocher, Keith E

    (University of Michigan)

Abstract

Introduction: Physicians and other healthcare professionals have critical expertise and important experiences to help shape public policy, yet, historically, have been less likely to engage in the political process as measured by their propensity to vote. We examine whether previous trends in low physician voter turnout persist, contrasting to similar occupational groups and the general population. Methods: Data were from the 2004-2018 Current Population Survey (CPS) November Voter Supplement, a biennial nationally representative household survey that collects self-reported or reports by proxy (household member) voting rates and behavior from congressional and presidential elections. We identified five representative healthcare professionals (physicians, dentists, pharmacists, registered nurses, physician assistants) and five other comparison professions (postsecondary teachers, chief executives, civil engineers, social workers, lawyers) selected by similarities in income or educational backgrounds. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were estimated from multivariable logistic regressions comparing voting rates and behavior across occupations controlling for the year and sociodemographic characteristics associated with voting. Results: The pooled sample of US citizens age 18 and older (N=750,236) included 3,009 physicians, mean age 47.6 (SD, 14.9) years, 33.5% women. Household-level response rates ranged from 84%-92%. Physicians and other healthcare providers were significantly less likely to vote than comparison professions or the public after controlling for characteristics associated with voting. Compared to the public, adjusted physician voting rates were 12% lower than expected: aRR of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83- 0.92) whereas comparison professions all demonstrated significantly higher voting rates, with postsecondary teachers showing the highest rates, aRR 1.18 (1.14-1.21). Physicians were 30% more likely to vote by mail, aRR 1.32 (1.12-1.42), and 15% more likely to vote before election day, aRR 1.15 (1.06- 1.25). Physicians who did not vote or register were 70% more likely to report this was due to being “Too busy, conflicting work or school,” compared to the public, aRR 1.7 (1.36 -1.96). Conclusion: Over 2004-2018, adjusted analysis find physicians and other healthcare professionals were significantly less likely to vote, whereas comparative professions were more likely to vote than the general public. Physicians were more likely to vote using alternatives to poll-based voting (voting early, vote by mail) and more likely to miss voting and registration due to work conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Solnick, Rachel Emily & Choi, Hwajung & Kocher, Keith E, 2020. "Voting Behavior of Physicians and Healthcare Professionals," SocArXiv chg26, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:chg26
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/chg26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5f9c4a80101721041ea4246d/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/chg26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:chg26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.