IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/brwf9_v2.html

The Rigid Economic Ladder Of New York City: The Factors That Have Led To Its Exacerbation And Their Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Nordberg, Sawyer

Abstract

A lack of government regulation over institutional interests has contributed to New York City’s rising economic inequality by depleting the assets of low-income residents and oftentimes indirectly transferring those assets to the rich, who oversee these institutional interests. Since 1980, economic disparities have widened across the U.S., while the gap in New York City has cratered into a ravine. The predominant reason for this growing wealth polarization is the city’s heavy concentration in the finance sector alongside loose financial regulation from the government. Previous research has primarily focused on economic divides in New York City relating to wage inequality and has thus been unable to uncover the impacts of this wage divide on the average New York City resident. This study uses a difference-in-differences analysis to focus on the city’s wealth divide, the government-sponsored factors that have led to its exacerbation, and the impacts it has had on the city’s real estate and healthcare landscape. Contrary to what is often assumed, economic inequality’s modern rise in the U.S. is not solely attributable to globalization and technologization. New York City’s rigid economic structure stems in part from a lack of monitoring from both federal and local government in housing, healthcare, and the transfer of wealth.

Suggested Citation

  • Nordberg, Sawyer, 2026. "The Rigid Economic Ladder Of New York City: The Factors That Have Led To Its Exacerbation And Their Implications," SocArXiv brwf9_v2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:brwf9_v2
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/brwf9_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69b71ff2ab63dba880e38063/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/brwf9_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark W. Frank, 2009. "Inequality And Growth In The United States: Evidence From A New State‐Level Panel Of Income Inequality Measures," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(1), pages 55-68, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Danny Ben-Shahar & Jacob Warszawski, 2016. "Inequality in housing affordability: Measurement and estimation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1178-1202, May.
    2. Batuo, Michael E. & Kararach, George & Malki, Issam, 2022. "The dynamics of income inequality in Africa: An empirical investigation on the role of macroeconomic and institutional forces," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Rey, Sergio, 2015. "Bells in Space: The Spatial Dynamics of US Interpersonal and Interregional Income Inequality," MPRA Paper 69482, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Dincer, Oguzhan C., 2011. "Trust and schooling in the United States," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 1097-1102, October.
    5. Thompson Jeffrey P. & Leight Elias, 2012. "Do Rising Top Income Shares Affect the Incomes or Earnings of Low and Middle-Income Families?," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, November.
    6. Suresh Nallareddy & Ethan Rouen & Juan Carlos Suárez Serrato, 2022. "Do Corporate Tax Cuts Increase Income Inequality?," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 35-91.
    7. Emma Hooper & Sanjay Peters & Patrick A. Pintus, 2021. "The impact of infrastructure investments on income inequality: Evidence from US states," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 227-256, April.
    8. Sebastian Doerr & Thomas Drechsel & Donggyu Lee, 2021. "Income inequality, financial intermediation, and small firms," BIS Working Papers 944, Bank for International Settlements.
    9. Kyungmin Kim, 2020. "Income inequality and house prices in the United States: A panel VAR analysis," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(3), pages 2111-2120.
    10. Dierk Herzer & Sebastian Vollmer, 2012. "Inequality and growth: evidence from panel cointegration," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(4), pages 489-503, December.
    11. Lockwood, Benjamin B. & Weinzierl, Matthew, 2015. "De Gustibus non est Taxandum: Heterogeneity in preferences and optimal redistribution," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 74-80.
    12. Bernard Njindan Iyke & Sin‐Yu Ho, 2020. "Consumption and exchange rate uncertainty: Evidence from selected Asian countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 2437-2462, September.
    13. Kennedy, Tom & Rae, Maria & Sheridan, Alison & Valadkhani, Abbas, 2017. "Reducing gender wage inequality increases economic prosperity for all: Insights from Australia," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 14-24.
    14. El-Shagi, Makram & Yamarik, Steven J., 2026. "Federal reserve monetary policy and income inequality across US states," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Sergio J. Rey, 2018. "Bells in Space," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 41(2), pages 152-182, March.
    16. Jalil, Abdul, 2012. "Modeling income inequality and openness in the framework of Kuznets curve: New evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 309-315.
    17. Kirill Borissov & Stefano Bosi & Thai Ha-Huy & Leonor Modesto, 2017. "Heterogeneous Human Capital, Inequality and Growth: The Role of Patience and Skills," EUSP Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2017/03, European University at St. Petersburg, Department of Economics.
    18. Nikos Benos & Nikolaos Mylonidis & Stefania Zotou, 2017. "Estimating production functions for the US states: the role of public and human capital," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 691-721, March.
    19. Dierk Herzer, 2016. "Unions and Income Inequality," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 30(3), pages 267-274, August.
    20. Atems, Bebonchu, 2018. "Regional heterogeneity in the relationship between inequality and growth: Evidence from panel vector autoregressions," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 41-47.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:brwf9_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.