IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/b27ny_v1.html

Beyond Rhetoric: Stakeholder Discourse and Urban Flooding in Accra, Ghana, 2015–2025

Author

Listed:
  • Dadson, Yvonne Appiah
  • Amankwah, Nana barima

Abstract

On June 3, 2015, Ghana experienced a catastrophic twin disaster when torrential rains exceeding 150 millimeters caused severe flooding across Accra, followed by an explosion at a GOIL (Ghana Oil Company) petrol station that claimed between 150 and 250 lives. This study employs systematic content analysis of 42 verified sources spanning 2015–2025 to examine how stakeholders framed disaster causation, attributed responsibility, and constructed narratives about urban vulnerability. Eight major themes emerged: infrastructure inadequacy appearing in 89 % of sources, blame attribution conflicts in 82 %, emergency response challenges in 76 %, urban vulnerability stigmatization in 71 %, climate change marginalization in only 34 %, policy implementation gaps in 68 %, community resilience recognition in 45 %, and institutional coordination failures in 63 %. Academic discourse evolved toward sophisticated structural analysis emphasizing vulnerability production processes, while government discourse remained focused on behavioral factors. May 2025 flooding killed four people, one in Abokobi and three in Adenta, displacing 3,000 exactly ten years after 2015, demonstrating that stated policy commitments failed to translate into improved outcomes. The National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO) admitted inadequate relief resources, contradicting a decade of capacity-building commitments. Recent research found 52 % of households blame weak enforcement with no rainfall correlation, while other studies found 59 % of flooded zones are deprived communities with formal models systematically underestimating vulnerability. Implementation gaps reflect weak accountability mechanisms, limited institutional capacity, political incentive structures favoring short-term projects, and insufficient civil society monitoring. Emerging partnerships including I-DIEM emphasizing equity-centered approaches and FAO promoting community-based response represent potential transformation directions, though effectiveness depends on sustained commitment and genuine institutional change. Keywords: disaster management, content analysis, urban flooding, Ghana, emergency response, urban vulnerability, institutional accountability

Suggested Citation

  • Dadson, Yvonne Appiah & Amankwah, Nana barima, 2026. "Beyond Rhetoric: Stakeholder Discourse and Urban Flooding in Accra, Ghana, 2015–2025," SocArXiv b27ny_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:b27ny_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/b27ny_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a473720d4135c9cda44f805/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/b27ny_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:b27ny_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.