IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/a73hb_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Building Consensus for Molecular Tumor Board Implementation in Europe: a Delphi procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Russo, Luigi
  • Lentini, Nicolò
  • Giacobini, Erika
  • Sabatelli, Alessandra
  • Osti, Tommaso
  • Kamal, Maud
  • Pastorino, Roberta
  • Boccia, Stefania

Abstract

Background: Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs) integrate molecular and clinical data to guide precision oncology decisions. However, their structure and functioning remain highly heterogeneous across Europe. This study aimed to develop consensus-based policy recommendations to support their harmonized implementation. Methods: A two-round Delphi process was conducted among 17 European experts actively involved in MTBs. Questionnaire items were derived from a systematic and scoping review on the clinical impact and implementation aspects of MTBs. Experts rated items on a five-point Likert scale, with consensus predefined as a Content Validity Index (CVI) ≥ 80% of experts agreeing or strongly agreeing (scores 4-5). Results: Across two Delphi rounds, 76 items were evaluated. Thirty-six achieved consensus and were consolidated into 15 recommendations across four domains: organizational aspects (n = 8), testing (n = 3), inclusion criteria (n = 2), and clinical aspects (n = 2). Organizational standards emphasized the appointment of a referent clinician, the use of standardized digital submission tools, online meeting formats, and the integration of decision-support systems. The recommended MTB composition was multidisciplinary, including oncologists, molecular biologists, pathologists, geneticists, and other relevant specialists. In the testing domain, experts agreed that NGS should be the preferred approach for molecular profiling, conducted in certified laboratories, with variant interpretation supported by curated databases (e.g., ClinVar, COSMIC, OncoKB). Inclusion criteria prioritized patients with metastatic or rare diseases, ECOG performance status 0–2, life expectancy ≥12 weeks, and exhaustion of standard therapeutic options. Conclusions: This Delphi consensus produced 15 policy recommendations to standardize and sustain MTBs across Europe. These guidelines complement existing frameworks by providing practical operational guidance for precision oncology implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Russo, Luigi & Lentini, Nicolò & Giacobini, Erika & Sabatelli, Alessandra & Osti, Tommaso & Kamal, Maud & Pastorino, Roberta & Boccia, Stefania, 2025. "Building Consensus for Molecular Tumor Board Implementation in Europe: a Delphi procedure," SocArXiv a73hb_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:a73hb_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/a73hb_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/68f0a5978759605e1c4973cb/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/a73hb_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:a73hb_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.