IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/92xk6_v2.html

Lessons from Tanzania’s Ujamaa for Smart Settlements in Nepal: Social Justice and Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattarai, Keshav
  • Adhikari, Ambika P.

    (Institute for Integrated Development Studies (IIDS))

Abstract

This article examines lessons Nepal can draw from Tanzania’s experience with Ujamaa, the African socialist development model initiated by President Nyerere in 1967. Using comparative policy analysis, published research, official documents, and exploratory field observations from selected Tanzanian locations, including the capital and villages in the Iringa Region, the study evaluates Ujamaa’s achievements and limitations. It assesses their relevance for Nepal’s landless populations and smart-settlement initiatives. The analysis focuses primarily on rural and peri-urban development and does not examine urban squatter housing and rural-to-urban migration. The comparison demonstrates that some lessons from Tanzania can be considered for Nepal’s own program. Ujamaa contributed to national integration, a shared linguistic identity, literacy, primary education, and rural services. However, it also reduced household autonomy, disrupted existing livelihood systems, and failed to achieve sustained agricultural productivity, employment generation, and income growth. The article also briefly discusses Nepal’s own Go to the Village Campaign of 1967, which had mixed success, and Korea’s generally successful 1970 Saemaul Undong movement for a comparative perspective of village-oriented national programs. The article proposes a Smart Settlement Framework for Nepal based on verified beneficiary identification, differentiated tenure and housing options, voluntary participation, livelihood-oriented site selection, serviced land, cooperative enterprise, accountable local governance, and measurable pathways from social protection to economic mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattarai, Keshav & Adhikari, Ambika P., 2026. "Lessons from Tanzania’s Ujamaa for Smart Settlements in Nepal: Social Justice and Economic Development," SocArXiv 92xk6_v2, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:92xk6_v2
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/92xk6_v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a6e3532b080d0f819ed2ae2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/92xk6_v2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Uma Shankar Panday & Raja Ram Chhatkuli & Janak Raj Joshi & Jagat Deuja & Danilo Antonio & Stig Enemark, 2021. "Securing Land Rights for All through Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration Approach: The Case of Nepal," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naghavi, Mohammad & Alesheikh, Ali A. & Hakimpour, Farshad & Vahidnia, Mohammad H. & Vafaeinejad, Alireza, 2022. "VGI-based spatial data infrastructure for land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Robert Peter Ndugwa & Clinton Kubondo Omusula, 2025. "Institutional Frameworks, Policies, and Land Data: Insights from Monitoring Land Governance and Tenure Security in the Context of Sustainable Development Goals in Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Gaspar Mora-Navarro & Carmen Femenia-Ribera & Joan Manuel Velilla Torres & Jose Martinez-Llario, 2022. "Geographical Data and Metadata on Land Administration in Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Stig Enemark & Robin McLaren & Christiaan Lemmen, 2021. "Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration—Providing Secure Land Rights at Scale," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-12, September.
    5. Bhattarai, Keshav & Adhikari, Ambika P., 2026. "A Historical Analysis of the Squatter Settlements (Sukumbasi) in Nepal and the Role of Smart Settlements," SocArXiv njcs5_v1, Center for Open Science.
    6. Ho, Serene & Choudhury, Pranab R. & Joshi, Richa, 2023. "Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    7. Shojaei, Davood & Ye, Yongxin & Zhang, Zezheng & Rajabifard, Abbas & Abedi, Fahimeh, 2025. "Updating cadastral base maps: An innovative approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:92xk6_v2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.