IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/8df7w_v1.html

Exploring Hymenectomy as a Clinical Response to Vaginal Penetration Distress: A Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Peyton, Alicea

Abstract

Hymenal-related distress—experienced as fear, pain, or avoidance of penetration—arises from both physical factors, such as anatomical variations, and psychological influences, including cultural beliefs, limited anatomical knowledge, and experiences of abuse. Hymenectomy, a straightforward outpatient procedure that removes or modifies hymenal tissue, is a well-supported treatment for structural hymenal problems, with literature primarily supporting its use in the relatively rare cases where the diagnostic presentation is clearly physical. However, little empirical evidence exists regarding how the procedure functions when the primary source of fear or phobia is psychological and the anatomy is normal. Recent conceptual work distinguishes fear-based penetration avoidance without pain—termed vaginal penetration phobia (VPP)—as a separate clinical phenomenon (Rabinowitz et al., 2017), further underscoring the need to examine psychological contributors to penetration distress. Using a biopsychosocial‑spiritual framework, this review underscores that no empirical studies have examined individuals’ awareness of hymenectomy, their anticipated or lived experiences of the procedure, or how it is positioned in relation to psychological distress and perceived normalcy with vaginal penetration.

Suggested Citation

  • Peyton, Alicea, 2026. "Exploring Hymenectomy as a Clinical Response to Vaginal Penetration Distress: A Literature Review," SocArXiv 8df7w_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8df7w_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8df7w_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/698f52ff0b4eac83b6c72909/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8df7w_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:8df7w_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.