IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/7vpbh_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unmasking Environmental Injustice: Intersectional Perspectives on COVID-19 ‘Social Distancing’ and the Exclusion of Marginalized Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Jackson, Nadine R.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed and exacerbated existing environmental and health inequities, yet limited research has examined how social distancing policies intersect with environmental justice concerns. This article investigates how seemingly neutral distancing guidelines functioned as mechanisms of environmental injustice in marginalized US communities. Drawing on existing research, this article evaluates physical and social dimensions of COVID-19 transmission patterns through methodology combining spatial analysis, and environmental justice frameworks, including intersectionality and Laura Pulido’s theory of racial capitalism. Statistical analysis reveals communities of color face 56-63% higher exposure to industrial pollutants, correlating with increased mortality rates. Airborne transmission research shows that standard distancing protocols were particularly ineffective in crowded, poorly ventilated spaces common in under-resourced communities. Historical practices of racial segregation directly predict contemporary COVID-19 mortality patterns, with some marginalized communities experiencing death rates 3.1 times higher than affluent areas. These findings challenge conventional public health approaches and provide an evidence-based framework for equitable crisis responses that address environmental racism, healthcare inequities, and economic exploitation. This work contributes to environmental justice scholarship by exposing how standardized public health measures can reinforce and amplify existing disparities, while advocating for structural interventions that center health equity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackson, Nadine R., 2025. "Unmasking Environmental Injustice: Intersectional Perspectives on COVID-19 ‘Social Distancing’ and the Exclusion of Marginalized Communities," SocArXiv 7vpbh_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7vpbh_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7vpbh_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/68d62d26ad6aaaf5626041e2/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7vpbh_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7vpbh_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.