IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/7fkvq_v1.html

Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence. The use of AI among working people–Differences between occupational groups, usage profiles, and perceptions of the consequences of AI in the workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Lünich, Marco
  • Keller, Birte
  • Marcinkowski, Frank

Abstract

This brief report presents the key findings of a segmentation study conducted in June 2025 as part of the Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence 3.0 (MeMo:KI 3.0) project. It analyzes the frequency of artificial intelligence (AI) use among 1,987 working people in Germany and its association with occupational classes, sociodemographic characteristics, and work-related attitudes. The results show clear differences between occupational classes based on the Oesch classification. Higher-skilled groups with technical or sociocultural work logic report regular AI use significantly more often. Lower usage rates, on the other hand, are found in occupational classes with lower formal qualifications or more standardized job profiles, such as skilled workers, skilled workers in the service sector, or employees in the commercial sector. Overall, it appears that a significant proportion of the working population has rarely or never worked with AI. More frequent AI use is associated with higher subjective AI competence and more positive affective attitudes toward AI in the workplace. Frequent users also rate the expected impact of AI on working conditions much more positively and report fewer negative affective and behavioral reactions to the introduction of AI in the workplace. Overall, the findings point to a digital divide in AI use along lines of age, education, and professional position.

Suggested Citation

  • Lünich, Marco & Keller, Birte & Marcinkowski, Frank, 2026. "Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence. The use of AI among working people–Differences between occupational groups, usage profiles, and perceptions of the consequences of AI in the workplace," SocArXiv 7fkvq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7fkvq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/7fkvq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69bc1d5aa5e7521b0d3aa1d6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/7fkvq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:7fkvq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.