IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/64uvj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Defining edible landscapes: a multilingual systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Rupprecht, Christoph David Dietfried

    (Ehime University)

  • Gärtner, Nadine
  • Cui, Lihua
  • Sardeshpande, Mallika
  • McGreevy, Steven R.
  • Spiegelberg, Maximilian

Abstract

The concept of edible landscapes seeks to combine a participatory approach to food production with wider concerns about well-designed, sustainable human-landscape relationships. Despite its decade-long history and seeming potential for holistically addressing multiple intertwined socio-ecological crises, the concept has received much less attention than related ideas such as green infrastructure or nature-based solutions. We conducted a systematic, multilingual review of 79 studies to understand how edible landscapes are defined, what their characteristics are, what trends exist in the literature, and how edible landscapes can be situated in the broader context of food production. Findings suggest that no clear definition of the term ‘edible landscape’ currently exists, although the implicit consensus is that edible landscapes feature food production as well as an aesthetic contribution. The literature holds high expectations but provides only limited empirical evidence for benefits. Edible landscape frames a unique conceptual space, which we visualize by placing it in relation with related concepts. We then propose two concise, genus-differentia definitions as a basis for academic debate, one of which expands the concept to include multispecies agency in designing landscapes. We conclude with a call for more empirical as well as theory-focused research to facilitate edible landscapes’ contributions to more sustainable human-nature relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Rupprecht, Christoph David Dietfried & Gärtner, Nadine & Cui, Lihua & Sardeshpande, Mallika & McGreevy, Steven R. & Spiegelberg, Maximilian, 2023. "Defining edible landscapes: a multilingual systematic review," SocArXiv 64uvj, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:64uvj
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/64uvj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/64014a73bbc5e50b4af81f7b/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/64uvj?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:64uvj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.