IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/4sy2k_v1.html

The Great Game: A Model of Geoeconomic Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Clayton, Christopher
  • Maggiori, Matteo

    (Stanford University)

  • Schreger, Jesse

Abstract

We build a model of two hegemons that have valuable trading relationships with each other and at the same time compete in exerting geoeconomic power over countries in the rest of the world. When the hegemons trade with each other their optimal policy is shaped both by classic economic considerations - the profitability of that specific trade - and by geoeconomic competition - how the trade affects the power of each hegemon vis-a-vis the rest of the world. We show that containment, a policy mix in which an hegemon attempts to limits sales of its inputs to the rival hegemon and uses its power to demand that the rest of the world shifts away from sourcing from the rival hegemon, arises when the two hegemons offer relatively substitutable exports since a stronger rival would offer a better outside option to the targeted countries. Accommodation between the hegemons, instead, occurs when power motives are small and the two hegemons focus on purely economic profit motives. We characterize how the rest of the countries welfare depends on the contain/accommodate regime of the hegemons.

Suggested Citation

  • Clayton, Christopher & Maggiori, Matteo & Schreger, Jesse, 2026. "The Great Game: A Model of Geoeconomic Competition," SocArXiv 4sy2k_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4sy2k_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4sy2k_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69c193d8704cc68184927dd6/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/4sy2k_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. Staiger & Kyle Bagwell, 1999. "An Economic Theory of GATT," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 89(1), pages 215-248, March.
    2. Ndiaye, Abdoulaye, 2024. "A Theory of International Boycotts," CEPR Discussion Papers 18868, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    3. Christopher Clayton & Matteo Maggiori & Jesse Schreger, 2024. "A Theory of Economic Coercion and Fragmentation," NBER Working Papers 33309, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Kyle Bagwell & Robert W. Staiger, 2004. "The Economics of the World Trading System," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262524341, December.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:j8wgx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyle Bagwell & Petros C. Mavroidis & Robert W. Staiger, 2003. "The Case for Auctioning Countermeasures in the WTO," NBER Working Papers 9920, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Zissimos, Ben, 2007. "The GATT and gradualism," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 410-433, April.
    3. Bown, Chad, 2007. "Developing Countries and Enforcement of Trade Agreements: Why Dispute Settlement Is Not Enough," CEPR Discussion Papers 6459, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Simon Schropp, 2007. "Revisiting the "Compliance-vs.-Rebalancing" Debate in WTO Scholarship a Unified Research Agenda," IHEID Working Papers 29-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Dec 2007.
    5. Ramphul Ohlan & Anshu Ohlan & Sudesh Chhikara & Tejaswini Singh, 2025. "Bibliometric Analysis and Review of World Trade Organization Research: Suggesting Future Avenues using WOS Database," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 3741-3771, March.
    6. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2002. "Trade Policies Based on Political Externalities: An Exploration, Third Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 04-006, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 04 Feb 2004.
    7. David Vines & Monika Mrazova, 2008. "Is the WTO's Article XXIV Bad?," Economics Series Working Papers 417, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    8. Bagwell, Kyle & Staiger, Robert W., 2010. "Backward stealing and forward manipulation in the WTO," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 49-62, September.
    9. Pol Antràs & Robert W. Staiger, 2012. "Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3140-3183, December.
    10. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2002. "Trade Agreements Based on Political Externalities, Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 03-035, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 30 Nov 2003.
    11. Mohammad Amin, 2004. "Time Inconsistency of Trade Policy and Multilateralism," International Trade 0402002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Mohammad Amin, 2004. "Imperfect Competition and the Theory of Managed Trade," International Trade 0402003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kempf, Hubert & Rossignol, Stéphane, 2013. "National politics and international agreements," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 93-105.
    14. Bernard Hoekman, 2008. "The General Agreement on Trade in Services: Doomed to Fail? Does it Matter?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 295-318, December.
    15. Ralph Ossa, 2011. "A "New Trade" Theory of GATT/WTO Negotiations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 119(1), pages 122-152.
    16. Fritz Breuss, 2004. "WTO Dispute Settlement: An Economic Analysis of four EU-US Mini Trade Wars," WIFO Working Papers 231, WIFO.
    17. Bård Harstad, 2020. "Trade and Trees: How Trade Agreements Can Motivate Conservation Instead of Depletion," CESifo Working Paper Series 8569, CESifo.
    18. Dai, Mengmeng & Hsu, Wen-Tai & Jin, Wei & Wang, Yongjin & Yang, Siqiang, 2026. "Comparative advantage and optimal trade policy with strategic interactions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    19. Ossa, Ralph & Redding, Stephen, 2026. "The Economics of Tariffs," CEPR Discussion Papers 21221, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Bown, Chad P. & Crowley, Meredith A., 2006. "Policy externalities: How US antidumping affects Japanese exports to the EU," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 696-714, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:4sy2k_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.