IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/489yx_v1.html

Gambling Industry Political Engagement, 2020–2026: A Proof-of-Concept for Auditing of Political Transparency Data using a GPT-assisted Pipeline

Author

Listed:
  • Close, James

Abstract

Background: Commercial political activity is increasingly recognised within the broader framework of commercial determinants of health. However, UK gambling-related political engagement is fragmented across separate transparency systems. This study examined whether a GPT-assisted, independently reconciled workflow could integrate these records and provide a more complete picture of disclosed political activity. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of UK gambling-related political engagement from 1 January 2020 to 25 August 2026 across three streams: (1) Electoral Commission political donations; (2) MPs’ declared hospitality/gifts and funded visits; and (3) ministerial meetings within the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport / Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). GPT was used to retrieve, structure, link and classify records against a reference frame of gambling organisations, which was derived from multiple public sources, including Gambling Commission registers, Companies House records, company and trade-body information, and historical ownership and corporate-relationship evidence. After classification, each of the three streams underwent an independent GPT reconciliation pass, followed by bounded human adjudication of unresolved cases. A final audit compared the final donations and hospitality datasets with previous UK journalism and civil-society reporting. Results: The principal analysis identified 127 donations with confirmed active commercial gambling connections, worth £7.73 million, from donors with a confirmed material commercial gambling connection active on the donation date. Of this value, 85.4% went to the Conservative political family and 13.0% to Reform UK. MPs declared 176 qualifying hospitality/gift events involving 71 MPs, worth £236,162, plus four funded visits. The ministerial-meeting census contained 272 gambling-related events, of which 86 involved principal commercial-industry actors. Across the 138-group company universe, meeting frequency was positively associated with both donation frequency (Spearman ρ=.390; p=.00004) and hospitality frequency (ρ=.487; p=.00001), although these associations are observational and non-causal. In the final audit against previously reported figures, 291 of the observed donation/hospitality records had no apparent or obvious match in the prior-reporting examined; and one genuine omission in this analysis was identified and corrected (related to hospitality). Conclusions: Systematic linkage across transparency systems revealed a scale and pattern of gambling-connected political activity that is not apparent from individual registers or prior headline reporting. GPT made this integration tractable, but independent reconciliation and human adjudication were essential. Integrated monitoring of political activity may therefore be important for understanding the commercial determinants of health in gambling and other harmful commodity industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Close, James, 2026. "Gambling Industry Political Engagement, 2020–2026: A Proof-of-Concept for Auditing of Political Transparency Data using a GPT-assisted Pipeline," SocArXiv 489yx_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:489yx_v1
    DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/489yx_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a972bdd9121b3495de36cd7/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31235/osf.io/489yx_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:489yx_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://socarxiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.