IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/yjbd7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Research Method we Need or Deserve? A Literature Review of the Design Science Research Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Nagle, Tadhg
  • Doyle, Cathal

    (Victoria University of Wellington)

  • Alhassan, Ibrahim
  • Sammon, David

Abstract

Despite multiple efforts by senior scholars, Design Science Research is viewed as underperforming given its distinct value for the IS domain. Conducting a descriptive literature review, this study sets out to survey the DSR landscape in the Senior Scholar Basket to measure the actual performance of DSR and provide a benchmark for future DSR strategies and studies. Reviewing 111 studies using a coding scheme developed over seven iterations, the status quo of DSR is depicted and analyzed. The results present: (i) the current balance between theoretical and practical impacts achieved in DSR, (ii) a pattern of perpetual black box prototyping, and (iii) a reluctance to tackle real-world messy problems and deliver practically useful artefacts. Finally, the study provides the IS community with the opportunity to reflect on the shape DSR has taken and decide if indeed this is what the community needs or deserves.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagle, Tadhg & Doyle, Cathal & Alhassan, Ibrahim & Sammon, David, 2020. "The Research Method we Need or Deserve? A Literature Review of the Design Science Research Landscape," OSF Preprints yjbd7, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:yjbd7
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yjbd7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ee0aae442fefb00350d4f1c/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/yjbd7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:yjbd7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.