IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/wzq2b_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Crumbling Ivory Tower: How Academia Abandoned Knowledge for Status

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver, James

Abstract

Academia claims to sell knowledge, but knowledge is now free. If knowledge is free, universities cannot justify their existence by providing information alone. Therefore, they must sell something else: status. Universities no longer hold a monopoly on learning. The internet, AI, and open-access research have made high-quality education widely available at little or no cost. Yet, academia retains its power by maintaining a credential monopoly, reinforcing exclusivity, and controlling access to research funding and professional validation. This paper examines how academia transitioned from knowledge gatekeeper to status gatekeeper. It explores the historical role of universities, their resistance to disruptive change, and the structural incentives that prioritize prestige over accessibility. The conclusion is clear: higher education must evolve into an open, decentralized model or risk becoming obsolete.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver, James, 2025. "The Crumbling Ivory Tower: How Academia Abandoned Knowledge for Status," OSF Preprints wzq2b_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wzq2b_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wzq2b_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/67a6d758688d6bea8caf42e9/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wzq2b_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wzq2b_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.