IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/wdj9e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

統計コミュニティは統計不正にどう対応したか: 毎月勤労統計調査問題における政府・専門家・非専門家のはたらき

Author

Listed:
  • Tanaka, Sigeto

Abstract

In Japan, we have recently witnessed several cases of long-overlooked misconduct in official statistics. The Japanese statistics community, which comprises people who are interested and skilled in statistics and capable of reading Japanese, does not appear to have made a remarkable contribution to detecting such misconduct. To discover the reason, this study focused on the incorrect method for estimating the number of workers introduced in 2018 to the Monthly Labour Survey by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). On the basis of literature published since 2018, the author revealed that both inspecting committees in the government and external statistical experts overlooked indications of method alteration as well as the biases resulting from it, because they worked only on documents and explanations prepared by the MHLW. The finding suggests that, with the exception of a few non-expert citizens in the periphery, the Japanese statistics community lacks data-based criticism. At the core of the community, statistical experts uncritically and unjustifiably approve what government statisticians contend, without conducting original research on publicly available data.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanaka, Sigeto, 2023. "統計コミュニティは統計不正にどう対応したか: 毎月勤労統計調査問題における政府・専門家・非専門家のはたらき," OSF Preprints wdj9e, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wdj9e
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/wdj9e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/65474be0d45f5a025be2fcb1/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/wdj9e?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:wdj9e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.