IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/tv9es.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wood, Hassall and colleagues (2018): Relationship among space quality, biodiversity and psychological restoration through mindsponge theory perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Minh_Hieu Thi Dr

Abstract

Wood, et al. [1] conducted a study on 128 park users in 12 urban parks to assess the nexus among site facilities of green space, biodiversity, and psychological restoration. The research findings showed a positive link between site facilities and biodiversity, and biodiversity can predict users’ restorative benefits regardless of age, gender, and ethnic background. According to the ecomindsponge information-processing approach, people make sense of nature through their subjective perceptions and process feedback from interactions with the environment [4]. This information-processing system naturally works toward the prolonge of people’s existence, including survival, growth, and reproduction. The physiological benefits of biodiversity have gradually affected park users’ mindsets on interaction with the natural environment, making the users’ perceptions of relaxation, beauty, and physical tiredness.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Minh_Hieu Thi Dr, 2023. "Wood, Hassall and colleagues (2018): Relationship among space quality, biodiversity and psychological restoration through mindsponge theory perspective," OSF Preprints tv9es, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tv9es
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/tv9es
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63ec9d45b3fed6064ee35a32/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/tv9es?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:tv9es. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.