IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/sw4mn.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

European Parliament’s Unconstructive Approach Towards Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Tulun, Teoman Ertuğrul

    (Center For Eurasian Studies (AVİM))

Abstract

As it was stated in the last week's Center for Eurasian Studies (AVİM) commentary on recent European Parliament (EP) resolution on Turkey, EP was adopted on 13 March 2019 in its plenary 2018 Commission Report on Turkey. Nearly in all its paragraphs, it puts forward a posture that openly displays its biased, discriminatory and libelous attitude not only against the government but also the people of Turkey. The call to suspend the accession negotiations, which are the core axis of Turkey-EU relations, clearly demonstrates that the European Parliament lacks a visionary perspective and fails to respect the principle of 'pacta sunt servanda'". In fact, the EP, apart from not respecting the principle of "pacta sunt servanda", also does not take into account and respect the verdicts of the European Court of Justice. Reference in the European Parliament Resolution to the 1915 events one of the prominent examples to the attitude ignoring court verdicts is the reference in the resolution to the 1915 events that is based on one-sided Armenian narratives. The European Parliament with its latest decision did not surprise. It ignored the European Court of Justice verdict and continued to demonstrate its biased, blatantly prejudiced attitude against Turkey and the Turks.

Suggested Citation

  • Tulun, Teoman Ertuğrul, 2019. "European Parliament’s Unconstructive Approach Towards Turkey," OSF Preprints sw4mn, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:sw4mn
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/sw4mn
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/637f59e05ea438101104946f/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/sw4mn?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:sw4mn. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.