IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/s764u_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Scholarly Peer Review: A Framework for Enhancing Efficiency and Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Wynne, Richard
  • Kolachalama, Vijaya B

Abstract

Scholarly publishing is a multibillion-dollar industry that evaluates research outputs and helps curate researcher reputation. These functions are underpinned by more than 100 million hours of volunteer peer reviewer time, representing an estimated $1.5 billion just in the United States . However, the status quo is under pressure from multiple forces: a growing number of research publications requiring peer review, questions about research integrity and reproducibility , business model changes and legal challenges from unpaid peer reviewers. The emergence of AI has exacerbated the problems, but AI also represents an opportunity to ameliorate the peer review experience and improve standards. We propose a framework for integrating AI into scholarly peer review that leverages the strengths of AI and human expertise. The framework offers a structured approach for evaluating the application of AI, with the aim of improving efficiency, consistency, comprehensiveness, and quality in the evaluation of scholarly contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wynne, Richard & Kolachalama, Vijaya B, 2025. "Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Scholarly Peer Review: A Framework for Enhancing Efficiency and Quality," OSF Preprints s764u_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:s764u_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/s764u_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6825d4cb318bac7468eadfbd/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/s764u_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:s764u_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.