IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/q7an9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bard evaluates US climate bill

Author

Listed:
  • Bard, AI

Abstract

Whether the bill is rational depends on your perspective. Some people believe that the bill is a rational response to the climate crisis, while others believe that it is not going far enough. The bill is rational in the sense that it is a significant step in the right direction. It includes funding for a variety of climate initiatives, such as clean energy research and development, energy efficiency programs, and climate adaptation efforts. These initiatives will help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of climate change. However, some people believe that the bill is not rational because it does not go far enough. They argue that the US needs to do more to reduce its emissions and invest in climate adaptation measures. They also argue that the bill is not ambitious enough, and that it does not do enough to address the climate crisis. Ultimately, whether the bill is rational is a matter of opinion. There are valid arguments to be made on both sides of the issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Bard, AI, 2023. "Bard evaluates US climate bill," OSF Preprints q7an9, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:q7an9
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/q7an9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/646cdeb2eade8106856620ef/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/q7an9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:q7an9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.