Author
Abstract
This chapter explores structural, environmental, and individual factors associated with reporting sexual exploitation among a sample of female sex workers in Bogotá. It examines secondary survey data on paid sexual activity with 2,684 sex workers conducted in 2017. Multivariable logistic regression was used to test for associations with self-reported victimisation. Findings reveal that neither Venezuelan nor internal migrants were more at risk than locals in reporting sexual exploitation. The associations with payment per client, having graduated high school, having a post-secondary education, and working on the street were also not significant. Instead, reporting police harassment (AOR=5.70, p <0.001) and feeling stigmatised (AOR=2.15, p <0.001) yielded positive and significant associations. These findings challenge the conflation between migration, sex work, and sexual exploitation by demonstrating migration is not a risk factor to victimisation and that sex workers do not have the same risk of reporting exploitation. The chapter concludes that legislation in Colombia facilitates police harassment and stigma against sex work which are associated with an increase in the risk of sexual exploitation. There is therefore a need to improve relationships between sex workers in Bogotá with the community and police to reduce the risk of this group of becoming victims of sexual exploitation.
Suggested Citation
Iglesias, Carlos, 2022.
"Risk factors related to sexual exploitation for a cohort of female sex workers in Bogotá,"
OSF Preprints
mvxbk, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:osfxxx:mvxbk
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mvxbk
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:mvxbk. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.