IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/jbup9_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Content Moderation in the Global South: A Comparative Study of Four Low-Resource Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Elswah, Mona
  • Bhatia, Aliya
  • Thakur, Dhanaraj

Abstract

Over the past 18 months, the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) has been studying how content moderation systems operate across multiple regions in the Global South, with a focus on South Asia, North and East Africa, and South America. Our team studied four languages: the different Maghrebi Arabic Dialects (Elswah, 2024a), Kiswahili (Elswah, 2024b), Tamil (Bhatia & Elswah, 2025), and Quechua (Thakur, 2025). These languages and dialects are considered “low resource” due to the scarcity of training data available to develop equitable and accurate AI models for them. We did this through essential collaborations with regional civil society organizations in the Global South to help us understand the local dynamics of their digital environments. Content moderation remains an area that technology companies keep largely inaccessible to public scrutiny, except for the information they choose to disclose. Our findings significantly contribute to the scientific and policy communities’ understanding of content moderation and its challenges in the Global South. The data we present in this report also contributes to our understanding of the information environment in the Global South, which is understudied in current scholarship.

Suggested Citation

  • Elswah, Mona & Bhatia, Aliya & Thakur, Dhanaraj, 2025. "Content Moderation in the Global South: A Comparative Study of Four Low-Resource Languages," OSF Preprints jbup9_v1, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:jbup9_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/jbup9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/68a61a455bee4ec0098a8c46/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/jbup9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:jbup9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.