IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/ex59m_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Stock of Knowledge Issue -Quantifying Indigenous Knowledge: Mechanisms of its Diffusion and Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Agbleke, Divine Swerwzie

Abstract

This study develops and tests an empirical model for quantifying Indigenous Knowledge within firms. Indigenous Knowledge is conceptualized as the cognitive and educational capacity embedded in an organization’s workforce—an intangible asset that has garnered increasing scholarly interest. The paper contributes to this discourse by proposing a measurable framework and examining its determinants. The stock of indigenous knowledge is operationalized through a weighted average of cumulative years of education, normalized by the number of employees with comparable qualifications. Using multiple regression analysis, the study evaluates the impact of training practices, organizational structures, and performance indicators on the average stock of indigenous knowledge across firms in the finance and insurance sectors. Findings reveal that access to formal documents by heads of departments, the nurturing of innovative thinking, and the implementation of effective—particularly standardized—training programs significantly enhance indigenous knowledge. Equally, an exclusive focus on productivity is associated with a reduction in knowledge stock. However, a significant interaction between productivity and incremental sales revenue suggests that the negative effects of productivity can be offset when accompanied by improved commercial performance. The study has both theoretical and practical implications. It advances the empirical measurement of indigenous knowledge in organizational contexts and provides actionable guidance for firms. Key recommendations include improving access to formal knowledge systems, integrating innovation into operational practices, designing standardized and effective training programs, and monitoring the interaction between organizational culture and structural mechanisms. Keywords: Indigenous Knowledge Knowledge Quantification Standardized Training Human Capital Firm Performance Knowledge Management

Suggested Citation

  • Agbleke, Divine Swerwzie, 2025. "The Stock of Knowledge Issue -Quantifying Indigenous Knowledge: Mechanisms of its Diffusion and Growth," OSF Preprints ex59m_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ex59m_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ex59m_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/68923da8701254bd96c612dd/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/ex59m_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinbing Wang & Huquan Kang & Luoyi Fu & Ling Yao & Jiaxin Ding & Jianghao Wang & Xiaoying Gan & Chenghu Zhou & John E Hopcroft, 2023. "Quantifying knowledge from the perspective of information structurization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:ex59m_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.