IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/epbdt_v1.html

Can Consciousness Nudge Randomness?

Author

Listed:
  • Holmberg, Ulf PhD

    (Swedbank)

Abstract

This paper presents the Cognitive Entropy Shift Model (CESM), a structured framework for exploring how distinct cognitive states, specifically passive emotional attention and goal-directed intention may influence probabilistic systems by reducing entropy. Drawing on principles from information theory and Bayesian-inspired probability updating, CESM conceptualizes consciousness as an informational constraint capable of subtly biasing outcomes in systems typically governed by randomness. To evaluate this framework, a two-year empirical study was conducted under controlled conditions using high-resolution data from a physical random number generator (RNG). CESM was used to predict when deviations from randomness would occur and the analysis revealed statistically significant deviations (t = -4.347, p < 0.001) during periods characterized by heightened emotional attention, with effect sizes in the range of 0.5-0.7%. These results aligned closely with CESM’s predictions. The effect also diminished with increasing spatial distance from the presumed source of influence, highlighting proximity as a potentially critical factor. In addition to presenting new empirical results, this paper also applies CESM retrospectively to earlier studies, offering a clear and testable reinterpretation of previously reported anomalies. By distinguishing between passive and active forms of cognitive engagement, and embedding them within a quantifiable statistical model, CESM provides a structured approach for examining whether, and under what conditions, cognitive states may correspond to subtle deviations in probabilities. The findings encourage further exploration into how consciousness relates to information, including potential effects across spatial distance, through a framework that supports the formulation of formal, testable hypotheses in advance of data collection, while remaining grounded in established scientific principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Holmberg, Ulf PhD, 2025. "Can Consciousness Nudge Randomness?," OSF Preprints epbdt_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:epbdt_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/epbdt_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6810e48f8f595d9b105ef90f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/epbdt_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hameroff, Stuart & Penrose, Roger, 1996. "Orchestrated reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: A model for consciousness," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 453-480.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mika Suojanen, 2019. "Conscious Experience and Quantum Consciousness Theory: Theories, Causation, and Identity," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(2), pages 14-34.
    2. Tanaka, Shigenori & Umegaki, Toshihito & Nishiyama, Akihiro & Kitoh-Nishioka, Hirotaka, 2022. "Dynamical free energy based model for quantum decision making," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 605(C).
    3. Stephan Peter & Bashar Ibrahim, 2024. "Intuitive Innovation: Unconventional Modeling and Systems Neurology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Perry, Anthony Leon, 2026. "Quantum Coherence in Neural Microtubules: A Unified, Empirically Grounded, and Testable Framework for Gamma Oscillation Precision," OSF Preprints 43qre_v2, Center for Open Science.
    5. Samirranjan Adhikari & Rupesh Mahato & Malay Halder, 2025. "The Relation between Supreme Soul and Individual Soul in Vivekananda’s Concept of Education: A Quantum Entanglement Perspective," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(5), pages 1348-1356, May.
    6. Markus A Maier & Vanessa L Buechner & Moritz C Dechamps & Markus Pflitsch & Walter Kurzrock & Patrizio Tressoldi & Thomas Rabeyron & Etzel Cardeña & David Marcusson-Clavertz & Tatiana Martsinkovskaja, 2020. "A preregistered multi-lab replication of Maier et al. (2014, Exp. 4) testing retroactive avoidance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, August.
    7. Chris Fields, 2015. "How small is the center of science? Short cross-disciplinary cycles in co-authorship graphs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(2), pages 1287-1306, February.
    8. Shirmovsky, S.Eh. & Shulga, D.V., 2021. "Quantum relaxation effects in Microtubules," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 582(C).
    9. Yu, Jiangbo Gabriel & Jayakrishnan, R., 2018. "A quantum cognition model for bridging stated and revealed preference," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 263-280.
    10. Shirmovsky, S.Eh. & Shulga, D.V., 2023. "Quantum relaxation processes in microtubule tryptophan system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 617(C).
    11. Shirmovsky, S.Eh. & Shulga, D.V., 2019. "Microtubules lattice equal-frequency maps: The dynamics of relief changes in dependence on elastic properties, tubulins’ dipole–dipole interaction and viscosity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 534(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:epbdt_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.