IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/cg3rw.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bringing together diverse perspectives – Stakeholders’ experiences of co-creation for research integrity guideline development

Author

Listed:
  • Labib, Krishma
  • Pizzolato, Daniel
  • Stappers, Pieter Jan
  • Evans, Natalie
  • Lechner, Iris

    (VU Amsterdam)

  • Widdershoven, Guy
  • Bouter, Lex
  • Dierickx, Kris
  • Bergema, Katinka
  • Tijdink, Joeri K.

Abstract

Current research integrity (RI) guideline development methods can miss diverging perspectives, but these are crucial for accounting for stakeholders’ needs across countries and disciplines. Co-creation could be a promising RI guideline development method. We conducted interviews with 22 stakeholders taking part in an RI guideline co-creation project. Our results indicate that stakeholders believe that co-creation stimulates the expression of diverse perspectives. Furthermore, they say that co-creation is powerful in engaging stakeholders, and increasing support for the guidelines. Our interviewees expressed that various features of co-creation contribute towards evoking a broad range of valuable ideas. Co-creation was deemed valuable for producing a rich harvest, including reaching agreement on crucial guideline elements, and for understanding important nuances. Our interviewees supported the use of a multi-stage co-creation methodology for the initial phases of RI guideline development. Based on these findings, we recommend guideline developers to consider using co-creation to bring together diverse perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Labib, Krishma & Pizzolato, Daniel & Stappers, Pieter Jan & Evans, Natalie & Lechner, Iris & Widdershoven, Guy & Bouter, Lex & Dierickx, Kris & Bergema, Katinka & Tijdink, Joeri K., 2021. "Bringing together diverse perspectives – Stakeholders’ experiences of co-creation for research integrity guideline development," OSF Preprints cg3rw, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cg3rw
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/cg3rw
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/610169ed317620023c381557/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/cg3rw?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:cg3rw. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.