IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/bwta3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Unrepresentative Democracy: How Disinformation and Online Abuse Hinder Women of Color Political Candidates in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Thakur, Dhanaraj
  • Hankerson, DeVan L.
  • Luria, Michal
  • Savage, Saiph
  • Rodriguez, Maria
  • Valdovinos, Miriam G.

Abstract

As more women have sought political representation by running for elected office, we have seen demonstrated increases in online harassment and abuse, including targeted mis- and disinformation campaigns. Researchers argue that these attacks are attempts to limit women’s ability to participate in electoral politics and suppress their voices in a variety of settings. While women in general may be subject to significant mis- and disinformation and abuse online, an intersectional approach which recognizes that women of color have to contend with multiple sources of oppression at the same time and that this impact is unique, can better illuminate the additional challenges faced by women of color in general and women of color political candidates specifically. We identified two key research questions: (1) Are women of color political candidates more likely to be subject to mis- and disinformation and online abuse compared to other types of candidates? (2) What are the impacts of mis- and disinformation and online abuse of women of color political candidates? We focus on both mis- and disinformation and online abuse because they are part of the larger problem of violence against women in politics and both are often aimed at undermining the political efficacy of women in public spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Thakur, Dhanaraj & Hankerson, DeVan L. & Luria, Michal & Savage, Saiph & Rodriguez, Maria & Valdovinos, Miriam G., 2022. "An Unrepresentative Democracy: How Disinformation and Online Abuse Hinder Women of Color Political Candidates in the United States," OSF Preprints bwta3, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bwta3
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/bwta3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6374fc4a069fa6070777a79f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/bwta3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:bwta3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.