IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/8b6zp.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A reply to Fairness, generosity and conditionality in the welfare system: the case of UK disability benefits by Johnson and Nettle: Inequality and existential threat

Author

Listed:
  • Dickins, Thomas Edmund

    (Middlesex University)

Abstract

Johnson and Nettle initially focus upon the detail of policy changes and argue that these changes may seem sensible to a social primate reflexively applying tribal scale psychology. This is a commentary upon policy makers. But later they shift their attention to a broader constituency, those to whom policy makers are appealing and those campaigning to change policy. In concluding comments, the authors state that their thesis could be coupled with a broader account of societal change, that might offer a richer interpretation of change, and it is to this idea that the current commentary is addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dickins, Thomas Edmund, 2021. "A reply to Fairness, generosity and conditionality in the welfare system: the case of UK disability benefits by Johnson and Nettle: Inequality and existential threat," OSF Preprints 8b6zp, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8b6zp
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/8b6zp
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5ff841f8e80d370134a5a482/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/8b6zp?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:8b6zp. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.