IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/6h5rg.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Open research case study - Political Science, Politics and International Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Rinke, Eike Mark

    (University of Leeds)

Abstract

Openness and transparency constitute a foundational principle for research integrity, as set out in the UK Concordat to Support Research Integrity. Openness can promote rigour, constructive scrutiny, accountability and can enable others to build on research. However, it can also bring challenges. Critically, what openness and transparency can and should mean varies across disciplines and fields of study. This is one of a series of case studies in a wide range of disciplines that illustrate these differences. The series is intended to enable researchers to see similarities and differences between fields, and to inform those supporting open research through, for example, training, policies or incentives. It is based on a single interview with a researcher, and is therefore illustrative rather than representative.

Suggested Citation

  • Rinke, Eike Mark, 2022. "Open research case study - Political Science, Politics and International Studies," OSF Preprints 6h5rg, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6h5rg
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6h5rg
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63571c8a93d35220c791c0b4/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6h5rg?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6h5rg. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.