IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/3zmjf.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Geographical diversity of management and organization research

Author

Listed:
  • Hensel, Przemysław

Abstract

Management and organization studies have been born over one hundred years ago as primarily a North American discipline. The current study, based on articles published in 88 quality journals between 1980 and 2020 aims at discovering whether the level of internalization of management scholarship changed over the last four decades. I find that the geographical concentration of authorships remains extremely high (Gini coefficient 0.89 for 1980 vs 0.87 for 2020), despite the number of participating countries increasing from 35 to 91. Most of the world (Asia, Africa, South America and Eastern Europe) inhabited by 6.8 billion people is still strongly underrepresented in the management literature, while the most productive nations increased their output. The growth of publications by non-North American authors was to a large extent driven by cooperation with North American scholars, especially in the case of Asia. The use of English as the native language explains most of the variance in national output, with use of a different language associated with 78% drop in the number of published papers, controlling for GDP per capita and population size. However, the analysis of citation rates for papers co-authored and not co-authored by North American scholars shows that the rates converge for all types of cooperation, controlling for authors count, affiliations count, and Journal Impact Factor. I conclude that management research becomes more internationalized, but it remains predominantly a North American enterprise, which brings about a number of challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Hensel, Przemysław, 2023. "Geographical diversity of management and organization research," OSF Preprints 3zmjf, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:3zmjf
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/3zmjf
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/63bd30029d8d3803fc6005d8/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/3zmjf?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan Zhang & Shanshan Wan & Peiling Wang & Peng Zhang & Qiang Wu, 2018. "A bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers in the field of Economics and Business based on the Essential Science Indicators database," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(2), pages 1039-1053, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qian Ma & Yandan Li & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Informetric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers in Environmental Sciences Based on Essential Science Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Gustavo Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho & Luis Mauricio Martins de Resende & Joseane Pontes & Hélio Gomes de Carvalho & Leozenir Mendes Betim, 2021. "Innovation and Management in MSMEs: A Literature Review of Highly Cited Papers," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    4. Buehling, Kilian, 2021. "Changing research topic trends as an effect of publication rankings – The case of German economists and the Handelsblatt Ranking," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    5. Kiran Kaur & Kwan Hoong Ng & Ray Kemp & Yin Yee Ong & Zaharah Ramly & Ai Peng Koh, 2019. "Knowledge generation in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(1), pages 149-169, April.
    6. Ziqiang Zeng & Lantian Shi, 2021. "A two-dimensional journal classification method based on output and input factors: perspectives from citation and authorship related indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3929-3964, May.
    7. Sepideh Fahimifar & Khadijeh Mousavi & Fatemeh Mozaffari & Marcel Ausloos, 2023. "Identification of the most important external features of highly cited scholarly papers through 3 (i.e., Ridge, Lasso, and Boruta) feature selection data mining methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3685-3712, August.
    8. Lauranne Chaignon & Domingo Docampo & Daniel Egret, 2023. "In search of a scientific elite: highly cited researchers (HCR) in France," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(10), pages 5801-5827, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:3zmjf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.