IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/metaar/y6jh2_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Integrating Machine Learning Standards in Disseminating Machine Learning Research

Author

Listed:
  • Edmunds, Scott C

    (GigaScience/BGI Hong Kong)

  • Nogoy, Nicole

    (GigaScience Press)

  • Lan, Qing
  • Zhang, Hongfang
  • Fan, Yannan
  • Zhou, Hongling
  • Armit, Chris J

Abstract

The increasing use of AI-based approaches such as machine learning (ML) across diverse scientific fields presents challenges for reproducibly disseminating and assessing research. As ML becomes integral to a growing range of computationally intensive applications (e.g. clinical research), there is a critical need for transparent reporting methods to ensure both comprehensibility and the reproducibility of the supporting studies. There are a growing number of standards, checklists and guidelines enabling more standardized reporting of ML research, but the proliferation and complexity of these make them challenging to use. Particularly in assessment and peer review, which has to date, been an ad hoc process that has struggled to throw light on increasingly complicated computational supporting methods that are otherwise unintelligible to other researchers. Taking the publication process beyond these black boxes, GigaScience Press has experimented with integrating many of these ML-standards into the publication process. Having a broad-scope that necessitated looking at more generalist and automated approaches. Here, we map the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) standards, and outline our adoption of the DOME recommendations for Machine Learning in biology. We developed a publishing workflow that integrates the DOME Data Stewardship Wizard and DOME Registry tools into the peer-review and publication process. From this case study we provide journal authors, reviewers and Editors examples of approaches, workflows and strategies to more logically disseminate and review ML research. Demonstrating the need for continued dialogue and collaboration among various ML communities to create unified, comprehensive standards, to enhance the credibility, sustainability and impact of ML-based scientific research.

Suggested Citation

  • Edmunds, Scott C & Nogoy, Nicole & Lan, Qing & Zhang, Hongfang & Fan, Yannan & Zhou, Hongling & Armit, Chris J, 2025. "Integrating Machine Learning Standards in Disseminating Machine Learning Research," MetaArXiv y6jh2_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:y6jh2_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/y6jh2_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/689fd81f00834a9abe299f19/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/y6jh2_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mariana Lenharo, 2024. "The testing of AI in medicine is a mess. Here’s how it should be done," Nature, Nature, vol. 632(8026), pages 722-724, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      NEP fields

      This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:metaar:y6jh2_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/metaarxiv .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.