Author
Abstract
Large Language Models exhibit remarkable linguistic fluency but remain fundamentally ungrounded in consequence. Hallucination is inherent to their architecture - probabilistic next-token prediction will always produce some confabulation. But the problem is severely exacerbated when training data carries no cost of error. A Reddit comment about nuclear physics and a peer-reviewed safety audit are treated as probabilistically adjacent tokens. This paper introduces *Superharddata* (SHD): a classification of information defined not by its format or source, but by the liability pressure under which it was generated. Borrowing from materials science, where superhard materials exhibit Vickers hardness exceeding 40 gigapascals, we define Superharddata by three epistemic properties: high Bulk Modulus (resistance to systemic distortion under scrutiny), high Fracture Toughness (maintenance of alignment during adversarial stress), and Creep Resistance (immunity to semantic drift over time). We argue that existing approaches to AI grounding - World Models, Embodied Cognition, and Blockchain Oracles - address only physical intuition, motor learning, or transactional verification, leaving the vast domain of institutional and human consequence unaddressed. To fill this gap, we present a General Theory of Incentive-Compatible Semantics, cataloging seven "Truth Bridges" across physical and institutional domains where reality enforces signal integrity through non-negotiable loss functions. We propose that fiduciary duty, anti-fraud liability, and survival pressure constitute a naturally occurring "loss function" that can ground AI reasoning in physical and social reality. Finally, we outline a Structured Disclosure Protocol for generating machine-readable Superharddata and a Federated Public AI Architecture for incorporating these signals into training and inference. This work supersedes and integrates two prior priority filings (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18111763 and DOI:10.5281/zenodo.18112796) by the author, establishing a unified theoretical framework for liability-grounded artificial intelligence, and is available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6004354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6004354 as well. This paper presents concepts adapted from a forthcoming book series by Gregory Caldwell Beier.
Suggested Citation
Beier, Gregory Caldwell, 2026.
"Superharddata: Liability-Grounded Information as Training Substrate for Aligned Artificial Intelligence,"
LawArchive
yhc6t_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:lawarc:yhc6t_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/yhc6t_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:yhc6t_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.