IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/uy3rq_v1.html

Legal Challenges and Approaches to Taxation of Digital Asset Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Strutovska, Nataliia

Abstract

Introduction. In the modern digital economy, transactions involving digital assets represent one of the most complex challenges in the field of financial law and tax administration. The absence of a unified legal definition of digital assets across different jurisdictions leads to conflicts in their classification as property, goods, currency, or financial instruments. Such discrepancies create conditions for “regulatory arbitrage” and increase the risks of tax evasion in the cross-border space. The rapid development of the cryptocurrency market and the implementation of blockchain technologies generate new challenges for national tax systems and necessitate the harmonization of legal approaches at the global level. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the legal challenges and approaches to the taxation of digital asset transactions, to identify the advantages and limitations of existing models in the European Union, the United States, and Asia, and to determine the directions of international harmonization in the context of financial digitalization. Materials and Methods. The materials of the study include scientific publications and regulatory legal acts concerning the legal status of digital assets and the practice of their taxation. The methodological framework is based on comparative legal analysis, logical generalization, systematization, and bibliometric review of modern research. An analytical approach without empirical data was applied to assess the impact of technological innovations. Results. The article systematizes approaches to the definition of digital assets in major jurisdictions and analyzes their tax regimes. It is established that the absence of a unified legal approach hinders the development of a stable international taxation system. The paper reveals the application of the MiCA Regulation in the EU, the fragmented U.S. model, and the polar scenarios of Asian countries. The results of pilot projects in the United Kingdom and Estonia on the use of blockchain technologies in tax administration are presented. It is proven that the effectiveness of digital solutions depends on the institutional capacity of the state and the level of international coordination. Prospects. Further research should focus on developing a model for a harmonized legal definition of digital assets, unifying approaches to their taxation, and creating unified standards for the use of blockchain technologies in tax administration systems. This will help reduce regulatory fragmentation and enhance the transparency of the global financial market.

Suggested Citation

  • Strutovska, Nataliia, 2025. "Legal Challenges and Approaches to Taxation of Digital Asset Transactions," LawArchive uy3rq_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:uy3rq_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/uy3rq_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/69df50860c40b8e42ffcd788/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/uy3rq_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Álvaro Hernández Sánchez & Beatriz María Sastre-Hernández & Javier Jorge-Vazquez & Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso, 2024. "Cryptocurrencies, Tax Ignorance and Tax Noncompliance in Direct Taxation: Spanish Empirical Evidence," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Junnan Cui & Li Gao & Yufei Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Cryptocurrency Exposure on Corporate Tax Avoidance Among US Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Katherine Baer & Ruud De Mooij & Shafik Hebous & Michael Keen, 2023. "Taxing cryptocurrencies," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 478-497.
    4. Georgiana-Iulia Lazea & Maria-Roxana Balea-Stanciu & Ovidiu-Constantin Bunget & Anca-Diana Sumănaru & Ana-Maria Georgiana Coraș, 2025. "Cryptocurrency Taxation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Emerging Trends," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-36, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hebous, Shafik & Vernon-Lin, Nate, 2024. "Cryptocarbon: How much is the corrective tax?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Shafique Ur Rehman & Touqeer Ahmad & Wu Dash Desheng & Amirhossein Karamoozian, 2024. "Analyzing selected cryptocurrencies spillover effects on global financial indices: Comparing risk measures using conventional and eGARCH-EVT-Copula approaches," Papers 2407.15766, arXiv.org.
    3. Arindam Misra, 2024. "Tax Policy Handbook for Crypto Assets," Papers 2403.15074, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    4. Álvaro Hernández Sánchez & Beatriz María Sastre-Hernández & Javier Jorge-Vazquez & Sergio Luis Náñez Alonso, 2024. "Cryptocurrencies, Tax Ignorance and Tax Noncompliance in Direct Taxation: Spanish Empirical Evidence," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Jabbour, George M. & Mansour-Ichrakieh, Layal, 2025. "“Dollarization vs. bitcoinization in Türkiye: Which is more dangerous for the financial market?”," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Gunay, Samet & Altınkeski, Buket Kırcı & Ismail Çevik, Emrah & Goodell, John W., 2023. "Quantifying systemic risk in the cryptocurrency market: A sectoral analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    7. Teodora Maria Suciu & Nicoleta Verejan & Adela Socol & Ioana Lazarescu, 2025. "Bibliometric Insights into Cryptocurrencies Literature," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 56-64.
    8. Shafique Ur Rehman & Touqeer Ahmad & Desheng Wu, 2025. "Novel modeling for assessment of extreme values risk in cryptocurrencies portfolio," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 2065-2092, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:uy3rq_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.