IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/usxmh_v1.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Skeletons In The Database: An Early Analysis Of The Cfpb'S Consumer Complaints

Author

Listed:
  • Ayres, Ian
  • Lingwall, Jeff
  • Steinway, Sonia

Abstract

Analyzing a new dataset of 110,000 consumer complaints lodged with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the "CFPB" or the "Bureau"), the authors find that: (i) Bank of America, Citibank, and PNC Bank were significantly less timely in responding to consumer complaints than the average financial institution; (ii) consumers of some of the largest financial services providers, including Wells Fargo, American Express ("Amex"), and Bank of America, were significantly more likely than the average consumer to dispute the provider's response to their initial complaints; and (iii) among the companies included in the database that provide mortgages, OneWest Bank, HSBC, Nationstar Mortgage, and Bank of America all received more mortgage complaints relative to mortgages sold than other mortgage providers. In addition, regression analysis suggests that consumer financial companies respond differently to complaints, depending on the type of product and issues involved, thereby generating significant differences in the timeliness of responses and whether consumers dispute those responses. Moreover, demographics matter: mortgage complaints per mortgage significantly increased in ZIP codes with larger proportions of certain populations, including Blacks and Hispanics. Companies were also less timely, and more likely to have their responses disputed, in areas with higher concentrations of senior citizens and college students, groups on which the CFPB is mandated to focus.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayres, Ian & Lingwall, Jeff & Steinway, Sonia, 2025. "Skeletons In The Database: An Early Analysis Of The Cfpb'S Consumer Complaints," LawArchive usxmh_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:usxmh_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/usxmh_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/680a492fb33e29b06d568c74/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/usxmh_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:usxmh_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.