Author
Abstract
English law examines a will's validity with great care and its findability not at all. The formalities of execution are policed at a single ceremony; what happens to the document afterwards — where it is kept, who knows it exists, whether anyone can produce it when its maker dies — is nobody's statutory business. There is no compulsory registration of wills in England and Wales, and whether a will is registered has no effect on its validity. Yet a will that cannot be found produces, in practice, the same result as a will that was never made: the estate passes on intestacy, or under an earlier document that happens to be producible. It does something stranger than leaving it to chance. Where a will was last known to be in the testator's own keeping and cannot be found at death, the law presumes the testator destroyed it intending to revoke it. Absence is read as intention. The presumption is rebuttable, and the leading authority on rebutting it — Sugden v Lord St Leonards — concerns the will of a former Lord Chancellor, drafted by his own hand, missing from a locked box that still contained its eight codicils. Probate of a copy or reconstruction is possible, by registrar's order, on evidence. The infrastructure that would prevent all of this exists in fragments. A statutory depository for the wills of living persons has operated since before the Senior Courts Act 1981 gave it its current footing, for a fee of £23; the Law Commission's 2025 report suggests its main defect is that too few people have heard of it. A commercial register holds the location of millions of wills, voluntarily. And sections 23 to 25 of the Administration of Justice Act 1982 — the statutory skeleton of a national deposit-and-registration scheme, with the Principal Registry of the Family Division as national body under the 1972 Basle Convention — have been on the statute book for forty-four years without ever being brought into force. In 2025 the Law Commission considered compulsory registration afresh and declined to recommend it. Discovery is therefore a household discipline by default; § 6 states the discipline.
Suggested Citation
Patterson, Joel, 2026.
"The Will Discovery Problem: Valid, Executed, and Nowhere to Be Found,"
LawArchive
qjme4_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:lawarc:qjme4_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/qjme4_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:qjme4_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.