IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/qcfk3_v1.html

Tax Administration and Racial Justice: The Illegal Denial of Tax Based Pandemic Relief to the Nation's Incarcerated

Author

Listed:
  • Book, Leslie

Abstract

This article examines the Internal Revenue Service’s administration of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act economic impact payment program and argues that the agency’s decision to deny and delay stimulus payments to incarcerated individuals constituted an unlawful exercise of administrative power with significant racial justice implications. The CARES Act broadly authorized economic impact payments for eligible individuals, yet the IRS adopted a policy that categorically excluded incarcerated persons from receiving relief despite the absence of statutory language supporting such a restriction. Through an analysis of the ensuing litigation, including the successful challenge brought in federal court, the article contends that the IRS’s policy was inconsistent with both the text and purpose of the CARES Act and violated administrative law principles governing agency action. Beyond the legal deficiencies of the policy, the article situates the controversy within broader discussions of tax administration, administrative burden, and racial equity. Drawing on theories of administrative burden and racialized burden, the article argues that the IRS’s actions imposed disproportionate hardships on incarcerated individuals and their families, many of whom are members of communities already disproportionately impacted by incarceration, poverty, and the COVID-19 pandemic. The article further highlights the practical barriers that incarcerated individuals faced in obtaining payments even after the policy was invalidated, including inadequate communication, limited access to filing mechanisms, and procedural obstacles embedded within IRS processes. By examining the relationship between tax administration and racial justice, the article demonstrates that administrative choices can reinforce existing social inequalities even when facially neutral. The article concludes by proposing a framework for anti-racist tax administration that emphasizes transparency, proactive consideration of racialized burdens, and greater sensitivity to the effects of administrative decision-making on vulnerable populations. [This abstract was written by Microsoft Copilot, a generative artificial intelligence.]

Suggested Citation

  • Book, Leslie, 2026. "Tax Administration and Racial Justice: The Illegal Denial of Tax Based Pandemic Relief to the Nation's Incarcerated," LawArchive qcfk3_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:qcfk3_v1
    DOI: 10.31228/osf.io/qcfk3_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6ab5264eab0bfa196ad32a47/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31228/osf.io/qcfk3_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:qcfk3_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.