IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/q7xw4_v1.html

Repair By Design: Using Civil Rights Law, Consumer Protection, Algorithmic Accountability, And Access To Justice To Address Structural Economic Inequities

Author

Listed:
  • Porter, Britney

Abstract

Artificial intelligence systems now function as allocative economic infrastructure, determining access to credit, employment, housing, and public benefits at scale. This paper argues that they must be governed accordingly through "repair by design" instead of harm-based remediation. This paper examines how artificial intelligence is reconfiguring contemporary economic and consumer systems by structuring access to credit, employment, housing, and public benefits through computational decision-making infrastructures. It argues that existing civil rights and consumer protection frameworks remain oriented toward individualized, retrospective enforcement and are therefore insufficient to address inequality generated through system-level design, data architecture, and algorithmic optimization. The analysis develops a theory of algorithmic economic repair, advancing the claim that civil rights law, consumer protection doctrine, algorithmic accountability frameworks, and access-to-justice mechanisms operate most effectively when understood as an integrated governance architecture for regulating economic participation. In this framework, artificial intelligence systems function both as regulated subjects and as allocative infrastructures that determine the distribution of wealth and opportunity at scale. Discrimination is conceptualized as structural and economic in nature, operating through barriers to capital creation, limited access to resources, and restricted pathways to long-term mobility that are now reproduced through computational systems. It further argues that effective governance requires a shift from harm-based remediation toward design-centered regulation, including auditability, institutional oversight, and measurable equity outcomes. The study closes by considering the transnational implications of AI governance, emphasizing that algorithmic systems circulate between jurisdictions and reproduce structural inequality globally. It concludes that "repair by design" is a governance requirement in digitally structured economies, requiring enforceable civil rights principles, accountable computational design, and access-to-justice systems capable of producing measurable economic repair. Also available on SSRN, Abstract ID No. 7159000.

Suggested Citation

  • Porter, Britney, 2026. "Repair By Design: Using Civil Rights Law, Consumer Protection, Algorithmic Accountability, And Access To Justice To Address Structural Economic Inequities," LawArchive q7xw4_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:q7xw4_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/q7xw4_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a642b3272f98b5cadc68a69/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/q7xw4_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:q7xw4_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.