IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/lawarc/pk5t9_v1.html

Gifts, Hospitality and Corporate Liability in Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law: An Analysis of the 2025 CGU Administrative Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Lagrotta, Luiz Carlos Nacif

Abstract

This article examines the fragile boundary between legitimate institutional courtesy and unlawful “undue advantage” under Brazil’s Anti-Corruption Law (Law 12.846/2013), with particular emphasis on gifts and hospitality offered by private entities to public officials. It takes as its starting point three Administrative Statements (Enunciados) issued in 2025 by Brazil’s Office of the Comptroller General (Controladoria-Geral da União – CGU) through the SIPRI/CGU system, which interpret the notion of undue advantage and the (il)legality of gifts, hospitality and invitations to entertainment events in light of Law 12.846/2013 and Decree 10.889/2021. After outlining the normative background and the legal status of Administrative Statements as instruments of interpretive harmonization, the article critically analyzes Enunciados 2, 5 and 6, assessing their compatibility with constitutional principles of Administrative Sanctioning Law, notably legality, typicity, roportionality and organizational culpability. It argues that, while the Statements contribute to legal certainty by anchoring the assessment of gifts and hospitality in objective parameters, they must be applied in a casesensitive manner in order to avoid both the trivialization of corruption risks and the overcriminalization of ordinary institutional courtesies. The article concludes with practical implications for corporate compliance programs and public sector integrity policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lagrotta, Luiz Carlos Nacif, 2026. "Gifts, Hospitality and Corporate Liability in Brazilian Anti-Corruption Law: An Analysis of the 2025 CGU Administrative Statements," LawArchive pk5t9_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:pk5t9_v1
    DOI: 10.31228/osf.io/pk5t9_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6a7e684e0728f329600021cb/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31228/osf.io/pk5t9_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:pk5t9_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.