Author
Abstract
Directors of public companies are responsible for overseeing complex organizations in a rapidly changing business environment, but they are not required to engage in continuing education. This creates a danger that directors will not have the knowledge they need to meet the significant demands of overseeing public companies. To address this, public companies should adopt mandatory continuing education policies for their boards, and the Securities and Exchange Commission should require public companies to disclose basic information about their continuing education programs in their proxy statements. This is the first scholarly article to address the issue of mandatory continuing education for directors of public companies. Public company boards have always needed continuing education. In this Article, I demonstrate that the need for continuing education is especially critical today. The responsibilities of the public company board have expanded dramatically over the last ten years. At the same time, the composition of public company boards has transformed, with less experienced individuals more likely to join public company boards than in the past. One would have expected public companies to respond to these two trends by adopting mandatory continuing education policies for their boards. However, they have not. I surveyed the organizational documents and proxy statements of sixty public companies, and I discovered that 93% of the surveyed companies do not require ongoing education for their directors; most public companies merely "encourage" directors to do so. In addition, many public companies currently claim to provide continuing education to directors on a voluntary basis, but they do not provide the necessary information to determine whether the programs are effective. Therefore, I recommend that the SEC promulgate rules requiring public companies to disclose (1) whether they have adopted a mandatory continuing education policy for their directors, and, if not, why not; and (2) basic information about their continuing education programs, including the content of the program, the amount of education provided to directors, and the identities of directors who participated in continuing education during the previous year. If adopted, these proposed rules will encourage public companies to provide effective continuing education to their boards, ensuring that directors will have the knowledge needed to meet their oversight responsibilities.
Suggested Citation
O'Hare, Jennifer, 2026.
"Continuing Education for Directors of Public Companies,"
LawArchive
fkdyb_v1, Center for Open Science.
Handle:
RePEc:osf:lawarc:fkdyb_v1
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/fkdyb_v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:lawarc:fkdyb_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lawarchive.info/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.