IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/opn/wpaper/26.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Norms, Occupational Groups and Income Tax Evasion: A Survey In The UK Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Sigala

Abstract

The traditional economic model argues that risk of detection and severity of penalty are the most important constraints of income tax evasion. However, it is difficult for the tax authorities to trace unreported 'cash in hand' payments. Almost all sole traders have opportunities for such payments. However, not all of them evade by means of 'cash in hand' transactions. The present study investigates the reasons for this. A hundred and thirty-nine sole traders in the UK construction industry completed a brief questionnaire regarding their views on 'cash in hand'. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that the constraints proposed by the traditional economic model do not significantly add to the prediction of sole traders' reluctance to deal with cash earnings beyond that afforded by a 'social norm' factor. The latter included taxpayers' perceptions about: the number of opportunities for cash income, the morality of evading tax by unreported cash earnings, frequency of 'cash in hand' among colleagues, clients' suspicion towards those asking for such payments, the risk to one's professional reputation, the acceptability of cash payments, and the value of asking for cash. Findings are discussed in terms of social norms and salient social groups in the context of tax evasion.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Sigala, 2000. "Social Norms, Occupational Groups and Income Tax Evasion: A Survey In The UK Construction Industry," Open Discussion Papers in Economics 26, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:opn:wpaper:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:opn:wpaper:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT team member (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deopeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.