IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/monogr/000361.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Evaluation and Develop Medicines in the Development of Medicines

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Drummond;George Teeling Smith;Nick Wells

Abstract

In most countries the resources available for health care are increasingly stretched in the face of the competing demands for their use. Therefore health care policy makers, planners and managers have begun to scrutinize all health care procedures and treatments more closely, in order to ensure that they give good value for money. Medicines have not been exempt from this process and there is increased emphasis on demonstrating additional benefit or social value from new medicines that is commensurate with their costs. The techniques of economic evaluation are well established as a method of comparing the costs and benefits of health care interventions. A number of evaluations of medicines have been undertaken and have contributed to the debate about their adoption within the health care system. Nevertheless, many issues remain unresolved. What steps should be taken to generate more high quality evidence on the costs and benefits of medicines? How should such evidence be interpreted and used by health care decision makers? What methodological uncertainties remain and how are these likely to be resolved in the future? This booklet is therefore for decision makers both within and outside the pharmaceutical industry. Written in a nontechnical manner, it outlines the importance of economic evaluation of medicines, the achievements to date and the potential for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Drummond;George Teeling Smith;Nick Wells, 1988. "Economic Evaluation and Develop Medicines in the Development of Medicines," Monograph 000361, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:monogr:000361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/economic-evaluation-and-develop-medicines-development-medicines/attachment-164-1988_economic_evaluation_drummond/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bernie O'Brien, 1991. "Cholesterol and Coronary Heart Disease: Consensus or Controversy?," Series on Health 000381, Office of Health Economics.
    2. J. N. Blau;Michael F. Drummond, 1991. "Migraine," Series on Health 000734, Office of Health Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Evaluation and Develop Medicines in the Development of Medicines;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:monogr:000361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.