IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/monogr/000268.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Post-Launch Studies: Matching the Desirable with the Feasible

Author

Listed:
  • Anne R. Mason;Michael F. Drummond;Adrian Towse

Abstract

Whilst companies routinely conduct post-marketing surveillance studies to collect data on adverse events, the focus of this report is on ‘post-launch’ studies conducted to collect information about health outcomes, including pharmacoeconomics data. By ‘post-launch’, we mean that they are undertaken after a drug has entered the market. This generally happens shortly after the product has received marketing authorisation in one country, which can be used as an ‘index date’ to establish post-launch status. Of course, drugs may receive a licence in one country whilst remaining ‘pre-launch’ in other settings. For the purposes of this report, we consider ‘post-launch’ studies to be those for products that have received marketing authorisation in at least one country. Post-launch studies have attracted more interest since some jurisdictions have requested economic data as part of their formal decision-making process on the pricing, reimbursement or use of drugs. There has been a growing realisation that much of the data required by reimbursement agencies cannot easily be provided before the drug is marketed. For example, it is difficult to know whether the clinical effect observed in short-term clinical trials is maintained in the long run. Also, it is difficult to know how well patients will adhere to the new drug in regular clinical practice and the long-term consequences of their withdrawal from therapy. Prior to launch it may have been difficult to compare the drug, in head-to-head clinical trials, with the most relevant alternative products. This could be because, during phase III, drug-licensing agencies have mandated particular comparators, or the use of a placebo. Alternatively, it could be because the main competitor products were themselves, at that time, investigational drugs. Since post-launch studies are not generally mandated by licensing authorities, the principal reason for companies to undertake such research is to gather more data or evidence that will maximise on the best study design.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne R. Mason;Michael F. Drummond;Adrian Towse, 2006. "Economic Post-Launch Studies: Matching the Desirable with the Feasible," Monograph 000268, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:monogr:000268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/economic-post-launch-studies-matching-desirable-feasible/attachment-300-2006_economic_post_launch_studies_mason/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Drummond & Bengt Jönsson & Frans Rutten & Tom Stargardt, 2011. "Reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: reference pricing versus health technology assessment," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 12(3), pages 263-271, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic Post-Launch Studies: Matching the Desirable with the Feasible;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:monogr:000268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.