IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ohe/conres/002377.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Case Study Analysis: Challenges in the NICE Evaluation of Multi-Indication Medicines for Rare and Ultra-Rare Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Errea;Nadine Henderson;Chris Skedgel;Mireia Jofre-Bonet

Abstract

Medicines for rare and ultra-rare conditions face distinct economic and ethical challenges compared to medicines for more common conditions. These challenges are implicitly acknowledged by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) by providing an auxiliary appraisal route for highly specialized technologies. However, concerns have been raised regarding the appraisals of medicines that don’t meet the strict criteria and are, therefore, evaluated via the standard appraisal route (STA). The STA pathway was not designed to consider the greater uncertainty associated with medicines for rare and ultra-rare conditions. In this report, we develop case studies to describe these challenges and how NICE approaches them in their assessment of these medicines. We conducted a series of stakeholder interviews to identify key perceived challenges, better understand the intricacies of the NICE appraisal process and the interplay with NHS England. The case studies include examples of cancer and non-cancer medicines, medicines with multiple indications, and those appraised by the STA and HST routes. In some cases, we find a flexible and pragmatic approach towards uncertainty; these positive examples include consideration of bespoke statistical modelling, expert testimony, and/or the use of real-world evidence. Less positive examples were also observed, especially around inflexible consideration of uncertainties inherent around ultra-rare conditions. NICE has recently proposed promising updates to their methods guidance, and NHS England has announced their intention to implement an Innovative Medicines Fund to fast-track new medicines, such as cutting-edge gene therapies. The authors believe these changes to be encouraging but draw attention to potential shortcomings and areas that may still require improvement to ensure that patients with rare and ultra-rare diseases are treated fairly, relative to patients with more common conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Errea;Nadine Henderson;Chris Skedgel;Mireia Jofre-Bonet, 2021. "A Case Study Analysis: Challenges in the NICE Evaluation of Multi-Indication Medicines for Rare and Ultra-Rare Diseases," Contract Research 002377, Office of Health Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ohe:conres:002377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ohe.org/publications/case-study-analysis-challenges-nice-evaluation-multi-indication-medicines-rare-and/attachment-ohe-report_henderson-et-al-2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    A Case Study Analysis: Challenges in the NICE Evaluation of Multi-Indication Medicines for Rare and Ultra-Rare Diseases;

    JEL classification:

    • I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ohe:conres:002377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publications Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ohecouk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.