IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaah/6-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceived Fairness and Regulatory Policy: A Behavioural Science Perspective on Government-Citizen Interactions

Author

Listed:
  • E. Allan Lind

    (Duke University)

  • Christiane Arndt

    (OECD)

Abstract

A great deal of research in psychology and policy studies has demonstrated that when citizens feel fairly treated in their encounters with government agencies, they are more likely to accept and comply with regulatory rules and decisions, to feel included in society and to trust their government. This paper explains how careful design of rocedures in the development and administration of laws and regulations and targeted training of officials can enhance perceived fairness and produce greater decision acceptance and compliance. It draws on a large number of empirical studies in different policy settings and countries to identify three key factors that drive perceived fairness: voice, respect and explanations. Successful programs to improve subjective justice must be built upon a foundation of objective justice: attempts to simulate fairness without actually providing objectively fair procedures tend to provoke very negative reactions when the true nature of the unfair process is discovered. Findings of this paper feed into OECD work on trust, open government and stakeholder engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Allan Lind & Christiane Arndt, 2016. "Perceived Fairness and Regulatory Policy: A Behavioural Science Perspective on Government-Citizen Interactions," OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers 6, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:6-en
    DOI: 10.1787/1629d397-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/1629d397-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/1629d397-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonia Settle, 2021. "'Don't play if you can't win': exploring household disengagement with the pension system through financial diaries data," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2021n29, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    appeal process; behavioural economics; citizen; compliance; consultation; enforcement; inclusive; regulatory policy; trust;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E03 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Macroeconomics
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaah:6-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.