IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaac/63-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Organisation of public administration: Agency governance, autonomy and accountability

Author

Listed:
  • Jesper Johnsøn
  • Lech Marcinkowski
  • Dawid Sześciło

Abstract

Good governance of public agencies requires the application of a set of regulatory and managerial tools to find the right balance between autonomy of agencies and adequate oversight from portfolio ministries and other actors. This paper provides insights from EU and OECD good practices, with a detailed analysis of EU acquis requirements for national regulatory agencies. New empirical evidence shows that public administrations in the Western Balkans and European Neighbourhood area lack clear policies and regulations for agency governance and misinterpret the EU acquis. This leads to a proliferation of agencies, duplication of functions and waste of public resources, a lack of accountability to portfolio ministries and generally a governance vacuum. Implementation of government policy is blocked and democratic accountability generally undermined. Finally, recommendations for better organisation of public administration are provided, based on the empirical analysis and lessons learned from SIGMA's engagement in such reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesper Johnsøn & Lech Marcinkowski & Dawid Sześciło, 2021. "Organisation of public administration: Agency governance, autonomy and accountability," SIGMA Papers 63, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:63-en
    DOI: 10.1787/07316cc3-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/07316cc3-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/07316cc3-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    accountability; agency governance; Armenia; autonomy; Georgia; Moldova; public administration reform; regulators; Ukraine; Western Balkans;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:63-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.