IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/elsaab/335-en.html

Taking the temperature on climate change and on just transition policies: Public sentiment in OECD countries

Author

Listed:
  • Herwig Immervoll

Abstract

International data on public sentiments show that a green transition cannot advance on environmental grounds alone; it must also address economic security and distribute transition costs fairly. This paper reviews national and international studies, presents new results across population groups in OECD countries, and discusses implications for designing and communicating reforms, including accompanying measures to cushion transition costs. On average across 27 OECD countries, over two thirds of respondents express climate concern, with notable upward trends in recent decades and a recent plateauing or softening. Sentiments differ across groups: women are more worried about climate change, and workers in emission-intensive industries sometimes less so. Yet patterns are more complex than stereotypes suggest; for example, older adults are often as concerned as younger ones. Crucially, explicit support for further climate action lags behind abstract climate concern. There is no evidence of systematic pushback against ambitious climate policies, but opinion data underscore the importance of demonstrating policy effectiveness and sharing adjustment burdens equitably. Financially vulnerable households and workers in high-emission sectors are more worried about negative knock-on effects of climate policies. Inclusive policy design, with transparent compensation, can address these economic vulnerabilities and associated concerns about climate action.

Suggested Citation

  • Herwig Immervoll, 2026. "Taking the temperature on climate change and on just transition policies: Public sentiment in OECD countries," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 335, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:335-en
    DOI: 10.1787/96cf0561-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/96cf0561-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/96cf0561-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:elsaab:335-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eloecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.