IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/edudde/55-fr.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Qui sont les meilleurs lecteurs en ligne ?

Author

Listed:
  • OCDE

Abstract

Singapour arrive en tête du classement à l’évaluation PISA de la compréhension de l’écrit électronique, suivi de la Corée, de Hong-Kong (Chine), du Japon, du Canada et de Shanghai (Chine). Les élèves d’Australie, du Canada, de Corée, des États-Unis, d’Irlande et de Singapour présentent le niveau le plus avancé de compétences en navigation web. Plus souvent que les élèves d’autres pays, ils sélectionnent soigneusement les liens à suivre avant de les ouvrir et suivent les liens pertinents aussi longtemps que la résolution du problème le nécessite. Il existe une forte corrélation entre la performance des pays en compréhension de l’écrit électronique et la qualité de la navigation des élèves sur texte électronique.

Suggested Citation

  • Ocde, 2015. "Qui sont les meilleurs lecteurs en ligne ?," PISA à la loupe 55, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:edudde:55-fr
    DOI: 10.1787/5jrtmzs1qfr2-fr
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrtmzs1qfr2-fr
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jrtmzs1qfr2-fr?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:edudde:55-fr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.