IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaaf/89-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How are countries balancing teaching staff compensation with broader education investment?

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

Teaching staff compensation forms the largest component of education budgets, averaging 58% of expenditure in public primary and secondary educational institutions across OECD countries. This share has remained broadly stable over time and across levels, despite differences in educational structures and evolving demands. Yet, behind this overall picture lies significant variation: in some countries, teaching staff compensation exceeds 75% of total spending, while in others it is below 45%. Meanwhile, there are several countries where non-teaching staff account for over 30% of spending, raising questions about resource allocation and opening another important debate on the balance between instructional needs and administrative support. This diversity in spending patterns highlights the complexity of implementing broad salary reforms – especially given that a 10% increase in teaching staff compensation would cost around 0.19% of GDP on average across OECD countries. Such an increase represents a substantial investment for governments, with unclear benefits for job satisfaction, given that most teachers remain satisfied with their jobs despite widespread dissatisfaction with their salaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2025. "How are countries balancing teaching staff compensation with broader education investment?," Education Indicators in Focus 89, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:89-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaaf:89-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.