IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaab/349-en.html

Towards a stronger link between PISA and PIAAC: Two assessments, one story?

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

How closely do the skills measured at age 15 predict the skills observed later in adulthood? This paper examines the relationship between the OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) and the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), drawing on newly available PIAAC Cycle 2 data. A series of country-level comparisons are used to explore the extent to which performance in reading/literacy and mathematics/numeracy aligns across the two assessments when viewed from different analytical perspectives, such as contemporaneous comparisons of PISA and PIAAC results, comparisons of matched pseudo-cohorts and comparisons of performance trends over time. The paper considers possible reasons for the similarities and differences between the results of both assessments, such as variations in assessment frameworks, target populations, sampling methods, testing conditions, motivation of respondents, and opportunities for developing skills throughout life. While PISA and PIAAC provide broadly consistent signals about national skill levels, the paper argues that differences in what and whom they measure, as well as in the contexts in which assessments are administered, limit direct comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2026. "Towards a stronger link between PISA and PIAAC: Two assessments, one story?," OECD Education Working Papers 349, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:349-en
    DOI: 10.1787/95e96165-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/95e96165-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/95e96165-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaab:349-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.