IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Ensuring a Sustainable and Efficient Fishery in Iceland

  • Gunnar Haraldsson
  • David Carey
Registered author(s):

    Iceland has managed its large fishing industry in a sustainable and profitable way. The foundations of this success are setting Total Allowable Catches (TACs) based on scientific recommendations of what is biologically sustainable and the Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) system, which gives each holder the right to catch a certain of the TAC in various species. The efficiency of this system could be under threat from potential policy responses to the perceived unfairness of quotas having initially been given away and by Iceland’s possible accession to the EU. However, there is nothing the government can do now to do undo the unfairness of the initial allocation. Nevertheless, it could be attractive to increase the special fisheries resource rent tax as it is likely to be a more efficient tax than most others, although the increase should not be so great as to damage the fisheries management system. The resource rent could also be increased by reducing TACs from the current, biologically sustainable level to the level that maximizes rent. Provided that Iceland is able to negotiate to maintain the authority to set TACs and to keep the ITQ system, joining the EU, and hence the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), should not reduce the efficiency of the Icelandic fisheries management system. This Working Paper related to the 2011 OECD Economic Survey of Iceland. ( Pour une pêche durable et efficiente en Islande L’Islande a géré son vaste secteur de la pêche de façon durable et rentable. Ce succès repose sur l’instauration de totaux admissibles de captures (TAC) fondés sur des recommandations scientifiques concernant la durabilité biologique, et sur le système des quotas individuels transférables (QIT) qui confère à chaque détenteur d’un quota le droit de pêcher une part du TAC défini pour chacune des espèces. L’efficience de ce système pourrait être menacée par des mesures publiques possibles en réponse au sentiment d’injustice lié à l’attribution initiale des quotas, et par l’adhésion éventuelle de l’Islande à l’UE. Toutefois, les autorités islandaises ne peuvent rien faire à présent pour remédier au caractère inéquitable de la distribution initiale. Néanmoins, il pourrait être intéressant d’augmenter la taxe spéciale sur la rente halieutique car elle devrait être plus efficiente que la plupart des autres taxes, à condition que cette augmentation ne soit pas trop forte pour ne pas porter atteinte au système de gestion des pêches. On pourrait aussi augmenter la rente halieutique en réduisant les TAC de façon à passer du niveau actuel qui est biologiquement durable à un niveau qui permette de maximiser la rente. Sous réserve que l’Islande soit en mesure de négocier pour conserver le pouvoir de fixer ses TAC et pour maintenir son système de QIT, l’adhésion à l’UE, et donc à la politique commune de la pêche (PCP), ne devrait pas réduire l’efficience du système islandais de gestion des pêches. Ce Document de travail se rapporte à l’Étude économique de l’OCDE de l’Islande 2011 (

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 891.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 19 Sep 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:891-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:891-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.