IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Improving Cost-Effectiveness in the Health Care Sector in Iceland

Listed author(s):
  • Hannes Suppanz
Registered author(s):

    Health outcomes and the quality of health care in Iceland are very good by international comparison, while income-related health inequality appears to be smaller than in most other countries. However, the health-care system is costly and, according to OECD estimates, public expenditure on health and long-term care could reach 15% of GDP by 2050 if no restraining measures are taken. This highlights the importance of raising cost-effectiveness and spending efficiency more generally. To this end, it would seem advisable to remove impediments to private provision and open up the health sector to competition. At the same time, the introduction of cost-sharing should be considered where it does not exist (as in hospitals), although concerns about equity need to be taken into account. This would relieve the burden on public finances, as would the introduction of spending ceilings, cost-efficiency analysis and activity-based funding arrangements. The high cost of pharmaceuticals should be reduced by promoting competition and the use of inexpensive generic drugs. Améliorer le rapport coût-efficacité dans le secteur de la santé en Islande En termes de comparaison internationale, les résultats et la qualité du secteur de la santé sont très satisfaisants en Islande, tandis que les inégalités en matière de santé liées au revenu semblent moindres que dans la plupart des autres pays. Toutefois, le système des soins de santé est onéreux et il ressort des estimations de l’OCDE que les dépenses publiques consacrées à la santé et aux soins de longue durée pourraient atteindre 15 % du PIB d’ici à 2050 en l’absence de mesures d’économie. D’où l’importance d’améliorer le rapport coût-efficacité et, plus généralement, l’efficience des dépenses. Dans ce but, il apparaît souhaitable de lever les obstacles à la prestation des services par le secteur privé et à l’ouverture du secteur de la santé à la concurrence. Parallèlement, il faudrait envisager la mise en place d’un système de partage des coûts là où il n’y en a pas (comme dans les hôpitaux), tout en prenant en compte de considérations d’équité. Ces mesures, de même que l’instauration de plafonds de dépenses, d’un système d’analyse de coût-efficacité et de mécanismes de financement en fonction des activités, permettraient d’atténuer la charge qui pèse sur les finances publiques. Il faudrait également diminuer le coût élevé des produits pharmaceutiques en favorisant la concurrence et le recours à des médicaments génériques peu coûteux.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Economics Department Working Papers with number 645.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 15 Oct 2008
    Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:645-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:645-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.