IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Policy Action in Private Occupational Pensions in Japan since the Economic Crisis of the 1990s

Listed author(s):
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan
  • Junichi Sakamoto

    (Nomura Research Institute)

Registered author(s):

    The public pension system of Japan provides coverage for all, irrespective of occupation and income. Corporate pension plans provide additional benefits over the public pension in order to meet the diversified financial needs in retirement and play a key role in enriching people‘s life after retirement. The majority of corporate pensions in Japan are defined-benefit type. Consequently, a great amount of attention is paid to benefit rights. Nevertheless, in order to avoid the discontinuation of pension plans due to over-emphasis on benefit rights, Japan introduced a measure under the stagnant economy during the 1990s allowing pension plans to reduce accrued benefits under certain strict conditions, only when the government acknowledges that the sponsoring company will go bankrupt if employers are forced to continue to contribute to the pension plans to the same extent. At the same time, Japan introduced another measure allowing pension plans to use smoothing for valuing its assets in order to avoid temporary market fluctuations. As a result, corporate pension plans in Japan became manageable from a long-term perspective and able to adopt a flexible plan design whilst still ensuring benefit rights. L'intervention des pouvoirs publics dans les régimes privés de retraite professionnels au Japon depuis la crise économique des années 1990 Le système public de retraite du Japon couvre tous les individus, indépendamment de leur situation professionnelle et de leurs revenus. Les régimes de retraite d'entreprise offrent des prestations complémentaires, qui s'ajoutent à la pension publique et permettent de satisfaire des besoins financiers diversifiés à la retraite, et contribuent de manière essentielle à améliorer la qualité de vie des individus après leur départ en retraite. La majorité des régimes de retraite d'entreprise sont des dispositifs à prestations définies au Japon. En conséquence, une grande attention est accordée aux droits à prestations. Néanmoins, afin d'éviter qu'une focalisation excessive sur ces droits à prestations ne débouche sur la liquidation de certains régimes de retraite, le Japon a adopté pendant la période de stagnation économique des années 90 des dispositions permettant aux régimes de retraite de réduire les droits constitués sous des conditions strictes, uniquement si le gouvernement reconnaît que l'entreprise promoteur du régime fera faillite si l'employeur est contraint de continuer à financer le régime considéré dans les mêmes proportions. Parallèlement, le Japon a adopté d'autres dispositions permettant aux régimes de retraite d'utiliser une méthode de lissage pour l'évaluation de leurs actifs, afin d'éviter des variations liées aux fluctuations temporaires des cours du marché. En conséquence, les régimes de retraite d'entreprise du Japon sont devenus gérables dans une perspective à long terme, et ont pu adopter une structure souple tout en préservant les droits à prestations.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions with number 41.

    in new window

    Date of creation: 01 Feb 2010
    Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:41-en
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16

    Phone: 33-(0)-1-45 24 82 00
    Fax: 33-(0)-1-45 24 85 00
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaab:41-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.